Sign in Subscribe

😇 Epiphany 2

Logan Martin Isaac

• 2 min read
😇 Epiphany 2

Readings: 📜Isaiah 49:1-7; 🎶Psalm 40:1-11; ✉️1 Corinthians 1:1-9; 🦅John 1:29-42. For full, free access, see pewpewhq.com/tfw/a-e02.

From the TRNG Room:

Also, check out uswithoutThem, a podcast exploring the discography of mewithoutYou!

Central Thesis/Theme:

I explore the tension between institutional control and personal moral responsibility through the lens of my martial hermeneutic. This episode is less about exegeting specific texts and more about revealing the infrastructure behind my paraphrase project and why I ground biblical interpretation in the experience of ordinary believers—the "grunts"—rather than institutional authorities. My military experience taught me that individual conscience and responsibility cannot be surrendered to systems, even when those systems claim divine authority.

Key Textual/Historical Insights:

Isaiah 49 contains dense armor of God imagery that I'm still unpacking: the mouth made sharp as a sword, hidden under the shadow of God's hand, made a "choice shaft." I'm investigating whether this connects to the martial staff (shepet shofar) that Zebulon holds in Judges 5, part of Deborah's victory song. These military breadcrumbs throughout Hebrew scripture point to families and lineages with martial vocations—like Barak from Kadesh in Naftali's tribal territory. I prioritize the Septuagint as our oldest manuscript tradition, older than the Masoretic texts we have from the ninth century.

Theological Argument:

The Hebrew Bible reveals moral coherency through a pattern of elevating the lowest to positions of significance—not because of their strength, but because God chooses them first. David didn't slay Goliath to earn kingship; he was anointed while still a shepherd, and his greatness came from owning his mistakes rather than justifying them. This challenges our assumptions about appointed versus anointed authority. What makes someone worthy isn't their position or power, but their character—specifically, their willingness to listen to conscience, take responsibility, and not hide behind systems that let them claim "somebody else made me do it."

Contemporary Application:

My experience preparing to deploy with a unit whose commander announced he'd plant weapons to protect soldiers by breaking the law taught me to trust that small still voice inside. When Lieutenant Colonel Browder later led troops who shot detainees with hands tied, it confirmed what my gut already knew. I can't redeem broken systems alone—redemption takes collective action. But I also won't surrender my responsibility or privilege as though that absolves me. We must hold both: we're not in control, but we remain accountable for how we use whatever power we're given. This applies whether you're a grunt in Iraq or navigating institutional Christianity.

Questions Raised:

  • How do we distinguish between legitimate authority (anointed) and mere institutional power (appointed)?
  • What does it mean that God chooses David before he demonstrates conventional qualifications for kingship?
  • Can individuals maintain moral responsibility within corrupt systems, or does participation itself implicate us?
  • Why does scripture repeatedly feature military families and martial imagery if these details aren't theologically significant?
  • How do we practice "togetherness" when harmony requires addressing rather than ignoring tension?